Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cast Images

Character Posters

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Film number three, and the story is starting to really pick up.  It begins to delve into the history behind the main villain, Voldemort.  The first two movies were all about establishing characters and locations.  In The Sorcerer’s Stone, he tries to come back and fails.  In The Chamber of Secrets, he tries to come back and fails.  But here, Voldemort isn’t trying another scheme to come back.  Instead, we learn a bit about what he was like, who his followers were, and who was opposing him.  We find out a little more about Harry’s parents and their friends, and that is what makes this movie so cool.

One of the most interesting, and I might say well-acted, scenes in the movie was the one where Snape confronts Lupin and Black in the Shrieking Shack.  There is a reason Gary Oldman, playing Serius Black, is widely considered one of the best actors of his age.  And Alan Rickman was great as Professor Snape.  One of the coolest choices Rickman made in his performance was when Lupin turns into a wolf.  At first, when Snape emerges from the tunnel, he is confronting the children, but as soon as he becomes aware of the werewolf, watch what he does.  He throws his arms out and interposes himself between the children and the dangerous creature.  I love that his first instinct is to protect the kids.  David Thewlis, was perfectly cast as Professor Lupin, and Timothy Spall’s performance as Peter Pettigrew was so delightfully pathetic.  And yes, I even liked Emma Thompson as the slightly daft Professor Trelawney.

And the acting from the film’s three leads, Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson, just keeps getting better.  The themes in the movie were darker and more adult than they had been in the previous films, and the trio did such a great job of keeping up with the more mature nature of the evolving plot.  They were great.  Also their on-screen chemistry just seemed to be getting tighter and tighter.  And lest I forget, I have to mention the addition of Michael Gambon to the cast.  Harris may have been a great actor, but I feel he was wrong for the part of Dumbledore.  Gambon brought some missing qualities to the character in a wonderful way.  He was confident, commanding, and even imposing when necessary.

One of the things I loved about this third installment of the franchise the most was how the aesthetics of the Harry Potter world were given a much needed modern makeover.  Nowhere was this change more evident than in the character of Cornelius Fudge, the Minister of Magic.  Here, he appropriately looked like he belonged in the 1990s and not the 1790s.

Then there were the Dementors.  Talk about terrifying things in a movie that is still mostly geared toward children.  These things would have really scared me when I was a kid.  They were just black, vaguely humanoid shapes that floated about, wraiths whose tattered robes fluttered like tentacles, even when there was no wind.  Such a great design!

OK, now on with the little details about the plot that didn’t sit right with me, and there weren’t many.  Rapid-fire style.  Flitwick doesn’t have any idea how to conduct a choir.  And if this is a start of year feast, when did the student choir have any time to rehearse their performance?  Parvati Patil’s Jack in the box clown was more terrifying than the snake.  Harry’s assault on Draco and his goons is ridiculous.  Harry is under a cloak.  You can’t throw a snowball if you are under a blanket.  If a Boggart takes the form of a Dementor, does he actually acquire the powers and abilities of a Dementor as well?  I would say not.  Otherwise Lupin would have turned into a werewolf when he saw the image of the moon in his classroom.  During their fight with the Whomping Willow, there is absolutely no way Hermione could have picked Harry up by the shirt, let alone perched unsteadily on a branch moving that quickly, lift him into the air, carry him with her, and accurately throw him into the tunnel.  Nope… Not buying that one.

Top 10 Favorite Parts

  1. Aunt Marge blows up and floats away like a balloon.
  2. Lupin’s worst fear, represented by the Boggart, is the full moon.  Foreshadowing!
  3. Lupin’s touching conversations with Harry on the bridge and in the forest.
  4. The Dangerous quidditch game in the rain, and that it was against Hufflepuff, not Slytherin
  5. Trelawney tells Hermione she isn’t cut out for divination.
  6. Trelawney goes into a real trance and utters a true prophecy.
  7. Hermione scares Draco senseless and then punches him in the face.
  8. The entire scene inside the Shrieking Shack.
  9. Snape protecting the children from the werewolf.
  10. After the time-turner adventure, Dumbledore saying “Did what?  Good night.”

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azakban cast images

Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter
Rupert Grint as Ronald Weasley
Emma Watson as Hermione Granger
Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid
Richard Griffiths as Vernon Dursley
Harry Melling as Dudley Dursley
Fiona Shaw as Petunia Dursley
Pam Ferris as Aunt Marge
Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore
Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall
Alan Rickman as Severus Snape
David Thewlis as Remus Lupin
Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy
Devon Murray as Seamus Finnigan
Matthew Lewis as Neville Longbottom
Alfred Enoch as Dean Thomas
James and Oliver Phelps as Fred and George Weasley
Julie Walters as Molly Weasley
Mark Williams as Arthur Weasley
Jamie Waylett as Vincent Crabbe
Josh Herdman as Gregory Goyle
Emma Thompson as Sybill Trelawney
Gary Oldman as Serius Black
Lee Ingleby as Stan Shunpike
Robert Hardy as Cornelius Fudge
Timothy Spall as Peter Pettigrew
Dawn French as the Fat Lady
Dementor
Buckbeak

1934 – Claudette Colbert (WINNER)

1933 – Claudette Colbert

It Happened One Night

What a gorgeous woman!  One of the things she is famous for, when it comes to this film, is the hitch-hiking scene, in which she shows her shapely leg to flag down a car.  And though I am no expert on the legs of women, even I have to admit, it looked pretty darn good!  Colbert took home the Oscar for her performance in this film and I have to question if I think it was deserved or not.  I mean, she was up against some pretty heavy hitters like Norma Shearer and Bette Davis.  But, yes, I think her performance was Oscar-worthy.

True she didn’t have Shearer’s absolute ease in front of the camera, nor did she have Davis’s intensity.  But there was an earnestness that Colbert possessed that the other women did not.  When she cried, the tears were real, if not powerful.  When she laughed, it was unafraid, if not practiced.  Colbert’s performance in this movie was honest and reserved, and utterly delightful.

There was one scene in particular that caught my attention.  It was the scene where she and Clark Gable pretended to be a bickering married couple.  Gable was wonderful, but Colbert put her rich heiress persona on the shelf to show us another side, a comedic side to her skills as an actress.  She was both funny and cheeky at the same time.  It was a fantastically funny scene.

But there was another scene that caught my attention, and not necessarily in a good way.  It was the scene in which she and Gable were about to sleep in a haystack.  Gable stands in the moonlight a few yards away lighting a cigarette.  It was an intimate, quiet moment.  She asks the man what he is thinking, but suddenly her voice has dropped into a very deep register.  Was she trying to be romantic?  Sultry?  Sexy? Why did she sound like she was a completely different woman?  I’m not entirely sure why, but it took me out of the moment, wondering what had happened to her voice.  I think a little more consistency with how the character sounded for the rest of the film would have served the scene better.  But really, she was wonderful, and I can’t praise the shapely beauty of that leg enough.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Cast Images

Character Posters

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

The second installment is, in my opinion better than the first for a number of reasons.  First, the story got a little darker than the first film.  It got a little more mature.  It retained its whimsical nature, but added a touch of weight and a noticeable amount of emotional heaviness.  Second, there was more actual magic, which, after all, is why we’ve all come to see the show.  There were more spells and more fantastic visual effects.  Third, the acting skills of the three main child actors, Daniel Radcliff, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, were markedly improved.

The tone and the visuals were decidedly darker than the first film, which was all for the better, especially for the adults in the audience.  The magic was more creepy and even the visuals were darker.  But here, we have Ginny Weasley being possessed by an evil memory recorded in a magical diary, writing on the walls with blood.  And then there was the Basilisk, a giant evil snake trying to murder children

Now, I have to applaud the three main actors.  They were great.  I think Radcliff showed the most improvement.  He seemed much more comfortable in the role, and was a lot less… nervous when delivering his lines.  He was a lot more confident, and there was a sense of graveness and weight to his performance.  Again, Grint did a great job, even though a lot of his performance in this film was just him being scared of one thing or another.  But his frightened, squeaky, high-pitched voice was actually funny and made me chuckle to myself.  But while Emma Watson was better here than in the first film, she still had a moment or two where her lines had an awkwardness in them that catch my attention every time. 

The first movie was all about introducing and establishing the characters.  Here were get to develop them and see them grow into fully fledged characters.  The three leads, not to mention the entire cast, both child-actors and adults alike, did great.  My favorites, aside from the three, were Alan Rickman playing Snape, Maggie Smith as McGonagall, Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy, and Gemma Jones as Madam Pomfrey.  Jones had a small role, but I loved her delivery.  Who am I kidding?  The whole cast was great.  But there were also a few new characters that were important to the plot, like Kenneth Branagh as Gilderoy Lockhart, and Toby Jones, who voiced the entirely CGI character of Dobby the House Elf.  And yes, the CGI on Dobby was an improvement on the CGI in the first film.

But that’s not to say the film was perfection.  Really quickly.  The pipes the basilisk was moving through must have been gigantic!  And he would have to have been moving around as silently as a ghost.  The Phoenix was a huge deus ex machina, having the exact powers Harry needed after his fight with the basilisk and the memory of Tom Riddle, like healing tears, and being able to carry heavy loads. Why did Mr. and Mrs. Weasley send all their children onto platform 9 ¾, except for Ron and Harry, then fail to notice that they had been left behind?  None of the teachers ever noticed the crumpled piece of paper in petrified Hermione’s hand?  The level of coincidence that saved every basilisk victim from death was staggering.  And it was also very convenient that Professor Sprout was growing Mandrakes, the very thing that could cure petrification.  And Lucius did not present Dobby with clothes.  He gave his servant something to hold for him.  He was not giving him clothes as a gift to keep.

But despite all that, I really liked the movie.  The visuals were awesome, the plot, while incredibly contrived at times, was fun and often clever.  The score was exciting, and the sets and costumes were spot-on.  It was darker than the first film, but still not too dark for a younger audience.  It was a worthy follow up to The Sorcerer’s Stone.

TOP 10 FAVORITE PARTS

  1. Our introduction to Arthur Weasley
  2. Ron’s EAT SLUGS spell backfires.
  3. McGonagall explains the history of the Chamber of Secrets
  4. Lockhart removes the bones from Harry’s arm.
  5. The Dueling Club
  6. Harry and Ron infiltrate the Slytherin common room.
  7. The Swarm of Spiders attack Harry and Ron
  8. Lockhart tries to escape Hogwarts and is exposed as a fraud
  9. Moaning Myrtle talks about her death.
  10. Harry stabs the diary and it bleeds ink, destroying Tom Riddle.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets cast images

Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter
Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley
Emma Watson as Herminoe Granger
Robbie Coultrane as Rubeus Hagrid
Richard Griffiths as Vernon Dursley
Harry Melling as Dudly Dursley
Fiona Shaw as Petunia Dursley
Richard Harris as Albus Dumbledore
Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall
Alan Rickman as Severus Snape
Miriam Margolyes as Pomona Sprout
Kenneth Branagh as Gilderoy Lockhart
Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy
Devon Murray as Seamus Finnigan
Matthew Lewis as Neville Longbottom
Alfred Enoch as Dean Thomas
Bonny Wright as Ginny Weasley
James and Oliver Phelps as Fred and George Weasley
Julie Walters as Molly Weasley
Mark Williams as Arthur Weasley
Joshua Herdman and Jamie Waylett as Gregory Goyle and Vincent Crabbe
Toby Jones voicing Dobby the House Elf
Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy
Shirley Henderson as Moaning Myrtle
Hugh Mitchell as Colin Creevey
Christian Coulson as Tom Riddle

1934 – William Powell

1934 – William Powell

The Thin Man

This was a fun movie.  It was mainly a who-done-it, but it was also a light comedy with a touch or romance, with just a hint of drama sprinkled on top.  This was the first in a franchise of six Thin Man movies.  What came next was After the Thin Man in 1936, followed by Another Thin Man in 1939, Shadow of the Thin Man in 1941, The Thin Man Goes Home in 1945, and finally, Song of the Thin Man in 1947.  The trick is that William Powell played the lead, Detective Nick Charles, but the actual Thin Man was the man who was murdered.  So naming the following five films using the same moniker doesn’t really make sense unless they all have stories that revolve around the original murdered man.

Powell was both handsome and charming, and seemed completely at ease in front of the camera.  He was paired with Myrna Loy throughout the entire franchise, and it isn’t hard to see why.  Their on-screen chemistry was plain to see.  There was a cute little interaction between them where he pointed to her chest, and when she looked down, he booped her nose, and had an adorable little chuckle to himself.  Powell really took the part and had fun with it.

Nick Charles was a functional alcoholic, and true to the character, Powell was rarely seen without a drink in his hand.  The guy drank like a fish.  But despite his constant state of inebriation, he was a happy-go-lucky guy who had a fantastic relationship with his wealthy wife.  I liked how his character was written in that he would frequently joke with her that he married her for her money, but the love behind the jest was real. 

And there was no denying his skills as a detective.  After all, the movie was a murder mystery, and by the climax, the good guy was able to expose the bad guy, giving us a happy, romantic ending to the delightful narrative.  Powell did a great job, and I’ll be honest.  If I had been a voting member of the Academy in 1934, I might have voted for him instead of that year’s winner, Clark Gable.  Powell was just so darn charming and playful in the role, and despite playing a smiling drunk, he made the character of Nick Charles incredibly likeable and truly memorable.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone Cast images

Daniel Radcliff as Harry Potter
Rupert Grint as Ronald Weasley
Emma Watson and Hermione Granger
Robbie Coltrane as Rubeus Hagrid
Richard Griffiths as Vernon Dursley
Fiona Shaw as Petunia Dursley
Harry Melling as Dudley Dursley
Richard Harris as Albus Dumbledore
Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall
Alan Rickman as Severus Snape
Warwick Davis as Filius Flitwick
Ian Hart as Quirinus Quirrell
John Hurt as Garrick Ollivander
Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy
Devon Murray as Seamus Finnigan
Matthew Lewis as Neville Longbottom
Alfred Enoch as Dean Thomas
James and Oliver Phelps as Fred and George Weasley
Sean Biggerstaff as Oliver Wood
John Cleese as Nearly Headless Nick
Zoe Wanamaker as Rolanda Hooch

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone

Cast Images

Character Posters

Harry Potter

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone

This is the movie that started them all.  The one that showed everybody, on the big screen, what they had been envisioning in their heads since reading J. K. Rawling’s fantastic series of books.  At first, I had gone into watching the films without having read the books, though I have since done that, as well.  There are so many things that the movie got right, though I’ll not say it was flawless.

First off, I loved the casting, and this was a huge part of the movie’s success.  It was the first movie in the franchise.  Can you imagine if they had cast someone other than Daniel Radcliff as Harry?  We would have gotten a completely different performance.  And bringing in Rupert Grint and Emma Watson.  What if there had been no chemistry between them and Daniel

But as it was, the three child actors, who were clearly novices to being in front of the camera, did a fantastic job.  I think Rupert Grint showed a little more natural ease in his acting than the other two, but they all did a great job  Special props to Alan Rickman and Robbie Coltrane, who were both perfect.  But I’m going to say it.  I know my opinion is not going to be a popular one, but… I’m sorry.  Richard Harris was wrong for the part of Dumbledore.  The character was supposed to be a strong and imposing figure, but because of Harris’s advanced age, he portrayed weakness.

One thing I didn’t care for was all the people in the Edwardian costumes.  This is supposed to take place in the modern world.  In the following films, as the three main cast members began to grow up, the period costumes were slowly phased out, but here it just came off as a little silly that EVERYONE was dressed as if they had just walked off the set of David Copperfield.  Another thing I didn’t get was why Ron, who grew up in the magical world, was constantly gasping “Woah!!” at things like moving portraits and Hagrid?  Wouldn’t those things would be commonplace to him?

And I have to make mention of the… questionable CGI.  But I get it.  It was the best they could do back in 2001.  But I’ll say it.  The troll was bad and the centaur was worse.  We have live action, live action, and suddenly… there’s a poorly rendered cartoon on the screen.  Fluffy, the three-headed dog was alright, even with his magical disappearing drool that vanished from Ron’s shirt, and the Quidditch players were actually pretty good.

But something I loved was the phenomenal score by John Williams.  It was grand and epic, and yet playful at the same time.  But then, when has Williams ever written a bad score?

But I’d have to say that the best part of the movie was how it clung to the source material.  It remained extremely faithful to the book.  So many film adaptations of books fall into the trap of changing things, for various reasons.  Either there wasn’t enough money in the budget, or someone didn’t like the plot devices, or a character’s motivations.  Maybe the special effects team thinks they can make things look cool if they add scenes that didn’t come from the author.  Maybe someone wants to instill a more family-friendly feel or make the lead seem more noble or heroic. But there was a reason the books were so popular.  When you start changing things, you are altering what made the books so well-loved.  I wish filmmakers would understand that when you remain faithful to the source material, you are making the existing fans happy, while at the same time, showing people who don’t know the books why they were so good.  And ultimately, you’ll have a better movie.

TOP 10 FAVORITE PARTS

  1. Harry releases the python at the zoo.
  2. Harry learns that he is a wizard.
  3. Harry Arrives at Diagon Alley.
  4. Harry meets Ron and Hermione.
  5. The start of year feast.
  6. Harry and Ron save Hermione from the troll.
  7. Harry’s first Quidditch match.
  8. McGonagall gives Malfoy detention.
  9. Harry receives the invisibility cloak.
  10. Harry fights Professor Quirrell and he dissolves into dust.

1934 – Frank Morgan

1934 – Frank Morgan

The Affairs of Cellini

This was a cute movie, and Frank Morgan was cute right along with it.  But I wouldn’t go so far as to say that he stood out.  You see, his role in this movie was only nominated for the Best Actor category because the Best Supporting Actor category had not yet been created.  In order for a supporting actor to stand out in the Best Actor category, he has to give us something extraordinarily phenomenal.  And while Frank Morgan did a fair enough job, he wasn’t as good as the nomination would suggest.  The roll wasn’t worth it.

I’ve only seen a few films that had Frank Morgan as a part of the cast, and I’ve never seen him play a lead part.  Sure, he portrayed the title role in The Wizard of Oz, but it was a supporting role.  And I saw him playing a smaller part in The Great Ziegfeld. But as far as I can tell, he seemed to play the same character in those two films as he did in this one.  He was a bumbling, yet loveable old man.  I have a feeling he was really just playing himself, though I have no proof of that.  For all I know, he was putting on an act, a façade that he knew the public liked.  Either way, the nervous, slightly confused, somewhat timid man could have stepped right off the set of The Wizard of Oz.

Here, he played Alessandro, the Duke of Florence.  He tries to make himself look competent, confident, and decisive, but he is easily confused, and even more easily swayed and manipulated by his ministers, his wife, and of course, Cellini.  He was amusing and fun to watch, but he was a one trick pony.  Yes, it was a good trick, but there was no variance to the performance, no spontaneity.  There was a certain charm about him that was unmistakable, and he used that charm in the same way from the beginning of the film to the end.  Would I have given him a Best Actor, or even a Best Supporting Actor nomination?  I don’t think so.

And honestly, I can’t find a good reason for his nomination.  Apparently, The Affairs of Cellini, was a disappointment at the box office.  Even on Rotten Tomatoes, the film has mediocre reviews, at best, and an audience score of 25%.  I’m not trying to say Morgan gave us a bad performance, just an unremarkable one.